EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Message

Harb · #1 Post by **Harb** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:15 pm

Put your favorite example of total failure here.

One failure image at a time, please.

Need some help? Look here!

Click Clack

Verilidaine · #2 Post by **Verilidaine** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:40 pm

viewtopic.php?p=161166#p161166

Alucard_Zagros · #3 Post by **Alucard_Zagros** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:43 pm

Sebbie · #4 Post by **Sebbie** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:14 pm

Verilidaine wrote:viewtopic.php?p=161166#p161166

You beat me to it! I am ashamed to say I was a contributor to the night of much spamming...

However, I do recall proving beyond a doubt that it was logically impossible for the thread to go off topic, so how it got locked is beyond me

admon · #5 Post by **admon** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:22 pm

Sebbie wrote:
Verilidaine wrote:viewtopic.php?p=161166#p161166

You beat me to it! I am ashamed to say I was a contributor to the night of much spamming... However, I do recall proving beyond a doubt that it was logically impossible for the thread to go off topic, so how it got locked is beyond me

obviously our logic failed there

Schrodinger · #6 Post by **Schrodinger** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:41 pm

Am I the only one that sees the humor in the EPIK PHAILURE thread becoming an EPIK PHAILURE?

AzeNaku · #7 Post by **AzeNaku** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm

Schrodinger wrote:Am I the only one that sees the humor in the EPIK PHAILURE thread becoming an EPIK PHAILURE?

Does that mean everything is still on topic?

supervanman64 · #8 Post by **supervanman64** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:20 pm

AzeNaku wrote:
Schrodinger wrote:Am I the only one that sees the humor in the EPIK PHAILURE thread becoming an EPIK PHAILURE?
Does that mean everything is still on topic?

That's apparently what me and Sebbie thought, but we had a logic fail with that.

Sebbie · #9 Post by **Sebbie** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:21 pm

Schrodinger wrote:Am I the only one that sees the humor in the EPIK PHAILURE thread becoming an EPIK PHAILURE?

Uhhh, no, Verilidaine beat everyone to it:

Verilidaine wrote:viewtopic.php?p=161166#p161166

EDIT to avoid double post:

supervanman64 wrote:
AzeNaku wrote: Does that mean everything is still on topic?
That's apparently what me and Sebbie thought, but we had a logic fail with that.

I still think my logic was impeccable. I CHALLENGE ANYONE TO POINT OUT A FLAW IN THIS:

Sebbie wrote: 1. If the thread gets off-topic, it has failed.
2. If the thread fails, it is on-topic.
3. Hence, the thread cannot get off-topic.

QED

The reward will be a cookie.

Tuna · #10 Post by **Tuna** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:48 pm

...aaaaand you're off-topic already. On page one. Congrats.
XD

Corezy · #11 Post by **Corezy** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:50 pm

Don't worry i'll steer this train back on-topic.

supervanman64 · #12 Post by **supervanman64** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:53 pm

lol at first I was like, "What so phail about that?"
then it hit me. Like a bag of bricks.

"Duh. CDs don't need to be rewound."

More logic fails for me!

Sebbie · #13 Post by **Sebbie** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:58 pm

We're talking about how the first Epik Phailure thread failed; how is that off-topic? But if you insist...

This is why I like my tiny car!

Double fail: Ninjad twice.

RedNeck Scott · #14 Post by **RedNeck Scott** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:38 pm

can someone tell me if this is win or fail because im not which to label it as.

Its me and my friends watching the superbowl in a winco foods parking lot. the idea was that when we ran out of food the store was 40ft away and when people were making beer runs they could check the score on there way in. the second pic didnt come out to good and the 2 guys on the right look like there doing something very wrong in public

Sebbie · #15 Post by **Sebbie** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:15 pm

Like RedNeck Scott, I don't know if this is a win or fail, but it made me laugh harder than I have in a while.

Twokinds Forums

EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux

Re: EPIK PHAILURE Part Deux