Ddraig wrote:amenon wrote:[...] [Note: This has an error on page 404. A sentence that should have been removed wasn't.]
I see what you did there.
The error was honest! But I, too, was amused by the page it happened on xD
Ddraig wrote:On that note, another user posted
this in which I noticed that while the person(s) who set the bounty on Trace in the beginning was changed to the Templar Council vice the Grand Templar, it still mentions a new Grand Templar here.
That's quite a bit later on, so it's entirely possible that there
is a new Grand Templar by that point. Just not within a few days of Trace's disappearance. (Indeed, that's maybe two days before Roderic, asking Eric about them,
describes Trace as the 'former Grand Templar')
In a similar vein,
here's someone looking for the Grand Templar in the same timeframe.
Incidentally, 193 and 237 are both pages that were removed from the books. (So even if they
should have changed, they perhaps
wouldn't have, because they were cut rather than edited. But there's no inconsistency, so I don't see any reason to assume it's an oversight.)
I.e, tl;dr: A new Grand Templar emerged while group A was
lost in the woods.